Skip to content

an automotive die-casting plant in Tennessee

How a U.S. Die-Casting Plant Cut Hand Filing Up to 90%

An anonymized automotive die-casting plant used vision-guided finishing robots on trim presses and deflash cells, cutting hand filing about 85 to 90 percent.

85-90%
Less hand filing
9 dies
Per cast type
2 types
One cell
Fewer
Comp claims

Based on a documented real-world deployment. Figures are from public reporting; the organization is not named.

Molten metal and cast parts on a busy foundry floor like an automotive die-casting plant.
Photo: Bence Szemerey

Manual deflash could not keep pace

An automotive die-casting plant in Tennessee produced gearbox and transmission cases where workers filed flash by hand after trim and blast steps. Volume and part mix grew, but the finishing task stayed hot, dusty, and hard on wrists.

Quality drifted when fatigue set in, and workers compensation exposure tracked every slip with a file or grinder. Leadership needed repeatable deflash without rebuilding the whole line.

  • Heavy hand filing on cast aluminum
  • Multiple die numbers per part family
  • Safety and consistency pressure
Manual grinding sparks, the kind of hand filing work the plant reduced with robots.
Photo: Yassir Abbas

Vision-guided trim and finish cells

Belt conveyors moving workpieces between stations in an automated finishing line.
Photo: Mark Stebnicki

Integrators paired large payload robots with belt conveyors and trim presses. Each loader uses vision to locate castings before press cycles, then routes parts to finishing robots with dual end-of-arm tooling.

Finishing stations use paired cameras to read die numbers and select the correct deflash path for two casting families, each with up to nine die variants in one automated cell. Shot blast unload closes the loop back to outbound conveyors.

  • Vision locate at trim press infeed
  • Die-number routing to deflash tools
  • Automated path through blast and outfeed

Measured shop-floor outcomes

Hand filing at the plant fell by approximately 85 to 90 percent after the cells went live. Flash removal became repeatable shift to shift, and fewer employees stood at grinding stations for full tours.

Safety metrics improved with fewer compensation claims tied to manual finishing. Flexibility held because the same cell finishes two casting types and multiple die numbers without tearing down fixtures between runs.

Finished metal gearbox housings stacked after trim and deflash.
Photo: Akshit Jhanwar

What metal casters can take away

Die casting lives or dies in post-process. When fettling stays manual, you pay in scrap, injuries, and takt time even if the press is fast.

Service Robot Co. did not build this Tennessee-area example. We help US foundries and tier suppliers pick vendor-neutral cobot rental or fixed cells, finance them, integrate vision and force control, train operators, and service the line nationwide. A pilot on one trim station can prove deflash time before you expand.

Frequently asked questions

The documented cell reads die numbers with vision and picks the matching deflash program. That is how two casting types, each with up to nine dies, run in one finishing area without manual changeover sheets.

More case studies

Find the robot that fits your site.

Free site assessment. We tell you what actually works before you spend a dollar.