Skip to content

an animal-litter manufacturing plant in Poland

How an Animal-Litter Plant Raised Palletizing to 40 Tons a Shift

A Poland animal-litter plant lifted end-of-line palletizing from about 20–25 tons per shift to roughly 40 tons with industrial palletizing robots.

~40 t
Per shift now
20-25 t
Manual before
~50%
Output lift
~5%
Plant output

Based on a documented real-world deployment. Figures are from public reporting; the organization is not named.

Bagged product stacked on pallets at the end of a manufacturing line.
Photo: Nikita Grishin

Manual stacking at the end of the line

Packaged litter left the conveyor as heavy sacks that workers stacked onto pallets by hand each shift. The operation handled on the order of three thousand sacks per shift at roughly six kilograms apiece, which made the palletizing station a strenuous bottleneck.

Leadership wanted to cut production standstills at the end of the line while moving people off the most taxing lifts and twists.

  • High sack count per shift at the palletizer
  • Powdery product shifts weight to the bottom of each bag
  • Manual stacking limited throughput and ergonomics
Manual stacking work like the heavy sack palletizing this plant replaced.
Photo: Tima Miroshnichenko

Industrial palletizers with defined layer patterns

Sacks feeding from a roller conveyor toward an automated palletizer.
Photo: Dávid Lehoczki

The site added two industrial palletizing robots fed from roller conveyors, stacking sacks in layers on standard europallets. Programming filled corners first, then edges, then the middle of each layer, alternating orientation layer to layer so powdery contents stacked safely.

Integrators tuned cycle times for five liter and ten liter bag formats with different layer counts per pallet.

  • Pick sacks from the outbound conveyor
  • Stack to corner-edge-center pattern per layer
  • Alternate bag orientation by layer for stability

Roughly double the tonnage palletized per shift

Before automation, workers palletized about twenty to twenty-five tonnes of goods per shift. After go-live, the robotic cell handled about forty tonnes in the same shift window, close to a fifty percent increase in palletizing output on the documented comparison.

Overall plant production rose by about five percent, and employees moved from physically stressful stacking to less demanding tasks elsewhere on the line.

Finished pallets ready for pickup after higher shift tonnage.
Photo: Willians Huerta

What pet and consumer goods plants can take from this example

This is a documented real-world outcome, not a Service Robot Co. client project. It shows why bagged product lines look at palletizing robot rental or purchase when manual stacking caps shift tonnage.

Service Robot Co. is a vendor-neutral integrator that selects palletizing robots across manufacturers, then finances, deploys, integrates, trains, and services them through a nationwide engineer network.

A month to month palletizing robot pilot can prove one shift loop before you add a second cell for higher bag counts.

Frequently asked questions

The published case states workers stacked about twenty to twenty-five tonnes of packaged goods per shift before robots were installed, with thousands of sacks handled by hand.

More case studies

Find the robot that fits your site.

Free site assessment. We tell you what actually works before you spend a dollar.