Key takeaways
- Four fields carry the quarter: runs completed, exceptions, uptime and staff touch time.
- Fix the definitions of a run and an exception once, then hold them steady across quarters.
- Group exceptions by cause so the trend points at a fix instead of a total.
- Measure uptime against scheduled hours only, and split service, waiting and unplanned charging losses.
- Keep the report to one page with the three or four decisions the quarter forces.
What belongs in a quarterly robot report?
A quarterly robot report has one job: show whether the robots did the work they were scheduled to do, where they stopped, and how much staff time they still consumed. Four fields carry that job. Runs completed, exceptions, uptime and staff touch time together tell an operations director whether the fleet is earning its place on the site. Everything else is context that can sit in an appendix.
The director reads the report to decide something. Keep the fleet as scheduled, add or move a unit, change a zone or time window, or escalate a service problem. A report that does not point at one of those decisions is a status log. Aim for a single page, with each field shown for this quarter, the quarter before, and one line on direction.
Definitions matter more than layout. Two sites can both report runs and count them in ways that do not match. Write the definitions on page one, hold them steady for the year, and change them only with a note explaining the break in the trend.
How should a run be defined?
A run is one scheduled task from start to finish, such as one scrub of a named zone or one delivery from a dock to a patient unit. Count completed runs against scheduled runs, not against whatever the robot happened to attempt. That ratio shows whether the schedule and the fleet agree, which is the first thing a director wants to know.
Keep every count tied to a zone and a time window. A scrubber that finishes its overnight list has done a full night's work, while one that finishes most of it has not, and only zone-level counts reveal that gap. If a run stops before it ends, log it as partial with the reason rather than rounding it up to complete. The three terms below are enough for most sites.
- Scheduled runs: tasks the timetable asked for during the quarter.
- Completed runs: tasks finished without an operator taking over.
- Partial runs: tasks stopped midway, then finished by hand or re-queued.
What counts as an exception?
An exception is any event where a robot stopped, asked for help, or left its route. Left unsorted, that word lumps together a blocked aisle, a dead sensor and a spill the robot declined to cross. Group exceptions by cause so the report points at a fix instead of a total.
Log each event once, with a timestamp, the zone, and whether it was cleared on site or escalated to the provider. The total matters less than the trend inside each group. A rising navigation count after a layout change tells a separate story from a rising hardware count, and the two call for different responses.
How should uptime be measured?
Uptime is the share of scheduled hours in which the robot was available to work. Fix the denominator before anything else. Scheduled hours should leave out windows when the site was closed or the timetable never asked for work, or the figure will blame the fleet for hours it was never meant to run.
Split lost time into three causes: waiting for service, waiting for a person, and charging that was not planned. Each has its own owner. Remote triage can clear some faults without a visit, and on-site dispatch handles the rest. The report should show the count of each and the time to response, because response time is what a director feels on a bad morning.
This is where a provider's records earn their keep. Service Robot Co. leases robots through a 3-year lease with one fixed robot lease payment quoted after a site assessment, and its nationwide engineer network handles remote triage and on-site dispatch. A robot maintenance service record that timestamps every fault, triage call and dispatch makes the uptime line checkable rather than estimated.
Why track staff touch time, and how?
Staff touch time is the minutes people spend on the robot's work: loading a unit, clearing a stall, checking a charge, walking a stranded unit back to base, answering an alert. It is the number that shows whether the fleet returned labor or only moved it. A fleet that completes runs while a supervisor still walks the floor all night has not delivered the labor result the business case promised.
Start with estimates from supervisors, then check them with a short timed sample each quarter. Estimates drift, and small interventions are the ones most often left out. Report touch time as total hours per shift and as minutes per completed run, so the director can see both the load and the efficiency behind it.
How do you keep the report short enough to act on?
Open with a summary of four lines: runs completed against scheduled, exceptions by cause with direction, uptime with its denominator stated, and touch time per shift. Each line carries this quarter, the quarter before, and a short note only where the number moved. Skip charts unless they answer a question the table cannot answer.
End the page with the decisions the quarter forces, not with a recap. Most quarters force one or two, and the common ones look like this:
Attach the raw run and exception logs as an appendix. Nobody reads them in the meeting, but the director should know they exist and that anyone can ask for them. An appendix keeps the page honest without filling it.
- Keep the fleet size and zone list as scheduled.
- Add or move a unit where exceptions are rising.
- Shift a time window that drives staff touch time.
- Escalate a repeated hardware fault pattern to service.
Who should sign the report, and how often?
Quarterly suits the director. Weekly logs belong to the site supervisor, who acts on a missed zone the same night. The quarterly report pulls those logs into a trend the director can judge, and it should be signed by the person who controls the operating budget together with the provider that services the fleet.
Good robot fleet management keeps those two sides talking. The provider's service record and the site's run log should match on fault times. When they disagree, the disagreement is itself a finding, and it belongs on page one.
Frequently asked questions
Want a robot working for you?
Tell us the job and the site. We will recommend the robot, quote the lease, and keep it serviced.



