Key takeaways
- Describe the edge pattern as a plan to confirm on site, not a guaranteed result.
- Keep crew trim and edge hours on the page so the robot is never presented as the whole mowing service.
- RTK accuracy figures are vendor claims, so say so every time you quote them.
- Confirm stop alerts for the exact model and account type before naming a response time.
- The lease quote follows the free site assessment, every time.
What the proposal has to answer first
A robot mowing proposal earns trust by saying exactly what the machine will cut, what the crew still does by hand, and what happens when the mower stops. A client who reads only the scope page should be able to tell which turf is robot work, which turf is crew work, and who gets called when a unit halts mid-job.
The proposal should also say where the quote comes from. A fixed robot lease payment is quoted only after a site assessment has walked and mapped the property, so any cut-result language must stay tied to areas that were actually assessed.
What follows is a working checklist for account managers: the cut, the crew scope, the mapping method, the alert path, and the assessment gate that comes before a number goes on paper.
How should the proposal describe the cut?
Clients ask about stripes and edges, and the honest answer depends on the pattern the mower runs. Husqvarna support material for its Automower EdgeCut feature says alternating-direction patterns, such as checkerboard or triangle, reach an edge from several angles, while a single-direction parallel pattern can leave edges uncut. The same page warns that checkerboard runs can slip on slopes and suggests setting the pattern at about 45 degrees to the slope.
Independent testing of edge-to-edge or stripe patterns on commercial turf was not found in our research. The pattern claims come from one manufacturer's support page, so the proposal should describe the intended pattern as a plan to confirm on site, not a guaranteed result.
Consumer tests show a practical edge gap. Galaxus found that a second small cutting disc handled edges on its tested unit, but right-angled corners stayed unmown. Put corners on the crew trim list, not in the robot promise.
What does the crew's trim and edge scope cover?
A robot mower handles the open turf. The crew still trims and edges the perimeter, beds, and obstacles the mower cannot reach cleanly, and the proposal should list those tasks by zone with the frequency agreed with the client.
Sequence matters. Write the crew pass and the robot pass into the same weekly plan, and show the crew as the lead on corners, tight curbs and every no-go zone the site assessment marked. That keeps the client from reading the robot as a replacement for the whole mowing service.
Trim hours stay with people, so describe them plainly. A proposal that names the crew's trim and edge tasks holds up better at renewal than one that hides them under the word automation.
How is the site mapped without buried wire?
Wire-free systems skip the boundary cable that older robots needed. RTK GPS uses a fixed base station and a receiver on the mower to correct its position, and one vendor, FJ Dynamics, reports 1 to 2 cm accuracy. That figure is manufacturer marketing rather than an independent test, so quote it as the vendor's claim.
Many commercial designs pair RTK with inertial sensors, and some add vision-based mapping. Belrobotics says its wire-free GPS-RTK system has been tested on more than 600 robots and gives its Bigmow model mowing capacity up to 75,000 square meters, both vendor-reported. The proposal can name the mapping method, but it should not borrow those capacity figures as proof for a specific client site.
Mapping belongs inside the free site assessment. Boundary zones, cart paths, slopes and obstacles get walked and recorded before a lease quote is built, and the proposal should state that the map is only as good as that walk. Setup still takes effort, so show it as a visible step in the timeline rather than a plug-in promise.
What should the crew hear when a mower stops?
A stopped mower is often the first time a client notices the robot, so the proposal needs a named alert path. Husqvarna says its Automower Connect app can send push notifications when a mower is stopped or moved outside its installation, and that the app keeps the last 50 error and information messages. Those are residential app features, so confirm they carry over to the commercial model you propose.
Robomow lets the owner pick which alert types its GSM module sends, including operation-stop alerts when a mower halts mid-operation. Landxcape describes real-time status and alerts aimed at homeowners and property managers. The pages we checked in November 2026 did not confirm if stop alerts work on multi-user or fleet accounts, or if they need extra cellular service, so verify per model before the proposal names a response time.
Write the escalation as plain steps: who receives the alert, who walks to the unit, and how the crew clears the path. Keep that language to what the chosen model actually sends.
Why does the lease quote come after the site assessment?
A lease quote written before anyone walks the turf is a guess with a number attached. Service Robot Co. offers robot lease options on a 3-year lease, with one fixed robot lease payment quoted after a free site assessment. The assessment maps the turf, marks slopes, drains and no-go zones, and gives the account manager the facts a proposal needs.
We are an OEM-neutral integrator, so the mower model is picked for the turf, not drawn from one maker's catalog. Our team handles robot deployment and integration, site assessment mapping and robot maintenance service through a nationwide US engineer network, so the account manager writes one proposal rather than coordinating several vendors.
Until the assessment is finished, the proposal should carry a scope statement, not a cut promise. Once it is finished, the quote can name the zones, the crew tasks and the alert path together.
What should an account manager hold back?
Some claims should stay out of a robot mowing proposal until someone has walked the ground. Each item below needs either a site assessment finding or a line in the crew scope.
Pair the list with the crew hours it leaves behind. A proposal that shows both the robot's zones and the people's tasks reads as credible rather than cautious.
- Slopes and banks the assessment has not walked, since checkerboard runs can slip on grades
- Right-angled corners and tight edges, which consumer testing showed can stay unmown
- Turf zones without a recorded map, including any area beyond the boundary the client approved
- Stop alert response times for a model until its alert feature is confirmed for that unit
- Site conditions that could interfere with satellite positioning, which the assessment should record
Frequently asked questions
Want a robot working for you?
Tell us the job and the site. We will recommend the robot, quote the lease, and keep it serviced.



