Skip to content

Trends & data

The Slow Cost of Putting Off Floor Robots

Waiting on floor robots costs staff hours, uneven shifts and a widening gap with peers. Learn what to measure and benchmark your floor care hours today.

By Aaryan Agrawal7 min read

Key takeaways

  • Every night of manual floor passes is labor you already pay for.
  • Uneven shifts leave floors looking inconsistent from one shift to the next.
  • Vendor case studies report large hour savings, but they are written to show favorable results.
  • Peers adopting robots for repetitive work build experience you will have to catch up on.
  • Benchmark your floor care hours for two weeks before you decide anything.

What does waiting on floor robots actually cost?

Waiting rarely shows up as one bad invoice. It shows up as a crew spending another night on passes a machine could make, a lobby that looks tired by the second shift, and a peer that quietly takes on work because it has hours you no longer have. The cost builds slowly, and that is exactly why it is easy to postpone.

Three costs matter most. The first is staff hours spent on repeat floor work. The second is uneven cleaning across shifts. The third is a widening gap with peers who put robots on the tasks that repeat every night. Each one can be measured, and each grows the longer a site waits.

Where do the staff hours actually go?

Vendor case studies, checked in November 2026, make the labor math concrete. In one healthcare case, SoftBank Robotics reports its S50 Pro ran floor care at two U.S. hospital units from 8:30pm to 2am. The vendor table puts floor care labor at 16 hours per night before the robots and 5 hours after, with the team shrinking from 3 people to 2. One staffer said about 8 hours could be reallocated.

An airport case shows the same pattern at another scale. Nilfisk says its Liberty SC50 at TORP Sandefjord saves the cleaning team about 3 hours a day. The airport's contractor put it differently: the machine saves two cleaners about 1.5 hours each per day. Same machine, same work, two framings, so ask who is counting what.

Why do floors look inconsistent from shift to shift?

Manual floor care depends on who is on, how long they have, and what the shift lead chose to prioritize. A strong crew one night can leave a floor in better shape than a short crew the next. Guests and staff notice that gap even when nobody writes it down.

Autonomous scrubbers are built to run the same route the same way, which narrows that variation. In a shopping center case study published by Tennant with Domus, autonomous cleaning averaged more than 2.5 hours per day, with 99.2% of runtime in autonomous mode. Domus says it now uses production rates and labor inputs from the program in future walkthroughs and bids.

How fast are peers moving?

The International Federation of Robotics (IFR) counted professional cleaning robots as the third largest professional service robot segment in its 2024 data. Unit sales rose 34% to more than 25,000, and most of those robots are deployed for floor cleaning, according to coverage of the IFR figures. The sample covered 294 service robot suppliers.

Total professional service robot sales reached almost 200,000 units in 2024, up 9%. Those are industry-wide numbers, not a count of what your neighbors run. IFR coverage also cautions against combining figures across separate World Robotics reports, so read the trend as direction.

What have larger deployments reported?

Larger sites tell the same story at scale. These figures come from vendors or press coverage, so they carry the same caveat as the earlier cases.

  • DSV Canada: robots set up by a custodial employee, mostly overnight, cleaned about 3.5 million square feet from summer 2020 to April 2021 and saved more than 300 hours of labor versus conventional methods, per press coverage.
  • A large grocer: robots deployed across nearly 90 stores reported 33,649 hours saved cumulatively in 2024. That is an aggregate across stores, not a per store figure, according to a Tennant case study citing a Brain Corp report.
  • Marsden: five floor care robots across a 500,000 square foot facility, deployed within ten days. The case study snippet we reviewed gave no hours figure.

Where do these numbers mislead?

Most of the case studies here were published by the companies that sell the machines, and they were written to show savings. A vendor table can be accurate and still show the best shift, the best zone or the best week. Read them as the range a well chosen site reported, not a forecast for yours.

Two checks help. First, ask whether hours are per night, per day or cumulative across sites, since the grocer and hospital figures do not measure the same thing. Second, ask what the baseline was. A block of 16 hours a night means little until you know the square footage and the team it replaced.

Where does a robot lease fit in?

Service Robot Co. (servicerobotco.com) is an OEM neutral commercial robot integrator for US businesses. We pick the right robots across manufacturers, lease them through financing, deploy and integrate them, train staff, and service every unit under RoboCare, our service plan, backed by regional service engineers in every state we service. One partner for the whole lifecycle, not six.

We lease robots. We do not sell them. A customer works through a three year lease with one fixed payment quoted after a site assessment, so the first step is measuring the floor rather than choosing a machine. For many sites that means commercial cleaning robot leasing or a floor scrubber lease, sized to the zones that repeat every night. For sites weighing overnight cleaning with no operator on shift, the assessment maps routes, charging points and access hours before any number is quoted.

How do you benchmark your floor care hours?

You can benchmark before talking to anyone. Log five things for every shift that touches a floor, across two weeks.

  • Labor hours on floor care, by shift and by zone.
  • Square footage covered on each shift, taken from your floor plan.
  • Repeat passes per zone, such as lobby, aisles or loading apron.
  • A one to five condition score for each zone at shift start and shift end.
  • Hours that land on the same zone twice in one shift, which usually marks where a robot would earn its place.

What do your totals tell you?

Set your totals beside the ranges above and adjust for size. If your nightly floor hours sit near the 16 hours the healthcare case reported before automation, the gap deserves a site assessment. If they sit well below, a robot may still help with consistency, but the case rests on other evidence.

Keep the log for a full month, then compare week to week variation. Those numbers, not any vendor table, are the starting point for your floor.

Frequently asked questions

Not always. In the healthcare case the team went from 3 people to 2, and one staffer said about 8 hours could be reallocated, so the role changed more than it vanished. Robots can take the repeat passes while staff keep detail work, restocking and inspections. Your log will show which tasks fit.

Want a robot working for you?

Tell us the job and the site. We will recommend the robot, quote the lease, and keep it serviced.

Sources

Keep reading

Free site assessment. We tell you what actually works before you spend a dollar.