Key takeaways
- AMRs earn their place on repetitive case and pallet moves between fixed points, not on every move in a beverage warehouse.
- Forklifts still fit best where loads, trucks and routes change from day to day.
- Cold aisles are a battery question first, so charging and exchange plans decide uptime.
- Published beverage case-picking results come mostly from vendors and their customers, so measure your own lane.
- Start with one lane, track fill rate, order accuracy and exceptions, then widen the fleet.
Where do AMRs pay off in a wine and spirits warehouse?
Autonomous mobile robots pay off in wine and spirits distribution centers when a move repeats, follows a predictable path and runs between fixed points: receiving to reserve, reserve to pick faces, staging to dock lanes. They do not pay off on every move. A forklift still earns its place wherever loads are irregular, trucks arrive in unpredictable condition or the route changes from day to day.
The reason starts with the product. Beverage is heavy, bulky and has an awkward center of gravity, and according to Beverage Industry that makes automated handling harder. Goods-to-person and AMR technology were not initially aimed at beverage, so the fit has to be earned lane by lane.
For most operators the answer is a split: robots on the repetitive lanes, forklifts on the exceptions, and one tested lane before the fleet grows.
What makes case and pallet moves in beverage hard to automate?
Wine and spirits move as cases, and those cases move as pallets built for stops on a delivery route. Supply Chain Dive reports that Southern Glazer's and Symbotic designed their systems to build mixed-case pallets for route-stop delivery and to handle both fast-moving and slow-moving inventory. One pallet build may combine a fast wine SKU with a slow spirits SKU, so the sequencing logic matters as much as the lift.
Heavy, top-heavy cases stacked high in narrow aisles leave little margin for error. Load stability limits the pallet height and the turning speed a robot can safely use, and those limits decide how much a given aisle can gain from automation.

Where does case picking pay off first?
The clearest public example is the November 2023 agreement between Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits and Symbotic to deploy Symbotic's robotic case-picking system in selected distribution centers. According to the companies, the stated aims were better fill rates, better order accuracy and more capacity inside existing facilities, with the first system targeted for 2025. The search did not confirm that the rollout has finished, so treat the agreement as a stated plan, not a proven result.
Exotec publishes a case study of a beer distributor with a growing spirits portfolio. The company reports that case picking and replenishment capacity rose to 900 cases per hour with three stations using Exotec Skypod robots. Read it as a vendor's account of one site, not a benchmark for your dock.
Lanes where AMRs usually earn their place tend to look like this:
- Receiving to reserve transfers of full pallets on a fixed path
- Replenishment of pick faces during a set window rather than on demand
- Staging to dock moves of mixed-case pallets for route trucks
- Empty pallet and tote returns back to the receiving area
Where does a forklift still fit better?
Forklifts keep the edge where the work is irregular. Trailer unloading is the usual case: each truck arrives with a different load pattern, door height and set of short or damaged pallets, and an operator can adjust on the spot. Ad hoc moves, such as a pallet staged on the wrong side of a lane or a rush order pulled from an unexpected location, also favor a person on a truck.
Route changes are the other test. A robot follows a mapped path, so a warehouse that re-slots SKUs every week or moves a pick zone every quarter has to remap and retest. A forklift needs a new instruction, not a new map. Many beverage operators will find that forklifts keep the exceptions while robots keep the repetition.
How do cold aisles change the robot math?

Cold aisles change the battery question before anything else. An independent study of the LOTIS cold-store robot, designed for about minus 20 degrees Celsius, found that lithium-ion batteries cannot be charged below freezing. The design relies on battery exchange plus charging in controlled environments, and low temperatures raised energy demand and cut operating time. Industry commentary in Air Cargo Week makes the broader point that batteries lose performance and life in the cold.
Most wine and spirits storage is kept cool rather than frozen, so the freezing problem is milder than in cold-chain food. Cool rooms still sit beside hot docks and open doors, though, and that swing matters. Plan the charge cycle, the exchange spares and the temperature zones together, or the fleet will spend its shift waiting on power. Some cold-chain robot makers publish their own battery claims. Treat those as vendor figures until independent work confirms them.
How do tight receiving windows affect a robot fleet?
Receiving windows compress the day. A supplier's truck gets a narrow slot, the freight has to be unloaded, checked and put away before the next carrier arrives, and any stall ripples across the dock. Robots help most once freight is off the trailer and staged, moving pallets continuously without waiting for a driver to return. They help least at the dock face, where the trailer, the door and the unloading crew meet.
The fix is a traffic plan, not more robots. Mark the staging area, keep dock lanes clear, schedule charging outside the peak window and agree in advance which moves a forklift handles during a surge. Operators who skip this step usually find the bottleneck at the door, not in the aisle.
How should a distributor start without stopping the dock?
Service Robot Co. is a full-service commercial robot integrator for US businesses. We are OEM-neutral, so we match robots to the job across manufacturers, then lease, deploy, integrate, train and service every unit through a nationwide US engineer network. Our three-year lease carries one fixed lease quote set after a site assessment, so a distributor can start with one leased unit on one lane and check the numbers before the fleet grows. One partner and one number cover the robots from install through go-live support and the service that follows.
Measure the things the Symbotic agreement names: fill rate, order accuracy and capacity. Add the measures that tell you whether the pilot works on your floor: cases per hour on the lane, minutes waiting for a charge, and the count of moves a forklift had to finish by hand. Set go or no-go thresholds before the first week, not after. Keep spare unit coverage or a backup plan so one stopped robot does not stop the lane. Phased deployment, without shutting the whole building, is the usual route.

What do the industrial robot figures say about beverage automation?
A3 reports that North American companies ordered 36,766 robots valued at $2.25 billion in 2025, up 6.6 percent in units. First-half 2025 orders rose 4.3 percent and revenue rose 7.5 percent against the same period of 2024, with 17,635 robots valued at $1.094 billion.
Those figures cover industrial robots and do not break out AMR or warehouse orders. They show the direction of the wider market, not the fit inside a beverage warehouse, which still has to be tested lane by lane.
Frequently asked questions
Want a robot working for you?
Tell us the job and the site. We will recommend the robot, quote the lease, and keep it serviced.
Sources
- Symbotic: Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits and Symbotic agreement
- Supply Chain Dive: Southern Glazer's plans warehouse automation with Symbotic
- Beverage Industry: Automation and data collection make robotics more appealing to beverage warehouses
- Exotec: Automating fulfillment in the alcoholic beverage industry
- Open ICM repository: cold-store robot study
- Air Cargo Week: Cold robots revolutionise cold chain logistics
- BusinessWire: A3 robot orders grow 6.6% in 2025
- The Robot Report: North American robot orders steady in first half 2025, A3 reports




